Analisis Aktivitas Bernilai Tambah ( Velue-Added Activities) dalam Program Corporate social Resposibility ( CSR) PT Dayamitra Telekomunikasi Tbk pada Wilayah Operasional Tower di Daerah 3T

Authors

  • Kurnia Indah Sari Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Syamsuri Rahim Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Hamzah Achmad Universitas Muslim Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56750/7qdjx548

Keywords:

CSR, Triple Bottom Line, Social License to Operate, wilayah 3T, keberlanjutan

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam perspektif Triple Bottom Line serta keterkaitannya dengan pembentukan Social License to Operate (SLO) pada wilayah 3T di Kabupaten Enrekang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan dokumentasi terhadap informan kunci yang dipilih secara purposif. Analisis data dilakukan melalui tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan, serta diuji validitasnya melalui triangulasi sumber.

 

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CSR dan keberadaan infrastruktur telekomunikasi dipersepsikan sebagai aktivitas bernilai tambah (value-added activities) yang berdampak multidimensional. Dimensi ekonomi (profit) menjadi aspek yang paling dominan, diikuti oleh dimensi sosial (people), sementara dimensi lingkungan (planet) bersifat pendukung. Temuan utama penelitian ini adalah reinterpretasi dimensi profit yang tidak dimaknai sebagai keuntungan finansial langsung, melainkan sebagai keberlanjutan operasional berbasis legitimasi sosial dan kepercayaan masyarakat. Manfaat nyata yang dirasakan masyarakat menjadi fondasi utama dalam pembentukan Social License to Operate, yang ditandai dengan tingginya penerimaan masyarakat, minimnya konflik sosial, serta stabilitas operasional. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis dalam memperluas konsep Triple Bottom Line dan Social License to Operate dalam konteks wilayah 3T, serta memberikan implikasi praktis bagi penguatan strategi CSR berbasis pemberdayaan ekonomi digital komunitas.

References

Bai, B., Nassimbeni, G., & Orzes, G. (2024). Global Reporting Initiative: Literature review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 471, 143428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143428

Bansal, P., Jiang, G. F., & Jung, J. C. (2020). Managing responsibly in tough economic times: Strategic and tactical CSR during the 2008–2009 global recession. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.07.002

Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR construct’s development and future. Business & Society, 60(6), 1258–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211001765

Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2019). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 32(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176

Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2020). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 45(3), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.56

Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.047

Kolk, A. (2019). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 54(6), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101045

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920915002

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2020). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 98(1), 62–77.

Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2019). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002

Ruggie, J. G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and global governance: The role of the United Nations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.25

Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722882

United Nations. (2020). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Vasconcelos, A. F. (2021). The role of corporate social responsibility in building social trust. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(6), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2020-0056

World Bank. (2021). Digital economy for development in rural areas. https://www.worldbank.org

Zhang, X., & Chen, H. (2022). Digital economy and rural development: Evidence from developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121138

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Analisis Aktivitas Bernilai Tambah ( Velue-Added Activities) dalam Program Corporate social Resposibility ( CSR) PT Dayamitra Telekomunikasi Tbk pada Wilayah Operasional Tower di Daerah 3T. (2026). Center of Economic Students Journal, 9(3), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.56750/7qdjx548