Exploring Market Dynamics: A Qualitative Study on Asset Price Behavior, Market Efficiency, and Information Role in Investment Decisions in the Capital Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v11i2.901Keywords:
Market Dynamics, Asset Pricing Behavior, Market Efficiency, Information Asymmetry, Behavioral BiasesAbstract
This qualitative study explores market dynamics, asset pricing behavior, market efficiency, and the role of information in investment decisions within the financial markets. The research aims to provide insights into the underlying motivations, perceptions, and experiences of market participants, offering a comprehensive understanding of these complex phenomena. Employing qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews and textual analysis, data was collected from a diverse range of participants including investors, financial analysts, and market regulators. The study found that market dynamics are influenced by various factors including investor sentiment, economic indicators, regulatory changes, and technological advancements. Behavioral biases among investors, such as herd mentality and overconfidence, challenge traditional theories like the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), indicating the presence of market inefficiencies. Moreover, information plays a central role in shaping investor perceptions and driving market trends, though concerns exist regarding the reliability of information sources in the era of social media and algorithmic trading. The study underscores the importance of investor education, diversified investment strategies, transparency, and regulatory interventions in fostering fair, efficient, and resilient financial markets. Moving forward, addressing these issues will be crucial for informed investment decision-making and advancing our understanding of financial market dynamics.
Downloads
References
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.129
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556419
Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01025-7
Bhattacharya, U., Galpin, N., & Ray, R. (2020). Algorithmic trading and information. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(9), 4389-4428. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa035
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992-1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2020). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007
Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton University Press.
Cashin, P. A. (1995). Informational efficiency in developing equity markets. The World Bank Economic Review, 9(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/9.2.159
Chen, J., & Zheng, W. (2021). The power of alternative data: Evidence from satellite imagery and market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(3), 928-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.006
Chen, W., Liao, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Understanding stock returns in different market conditions: A panel data analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 135, 106647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106647
Cochrane, J. H. (2014). Toward a run-free financial system. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.189
Dow, J. (1995). The usefulness of economic efficiency measures for strategic decision support. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518098
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (2021). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Princeton University Press.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575-1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x
Fama, E. F. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00026-9
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05202.x
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05202.x
Glosten, L. R., & Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90044-1
Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393-408. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805452
Hendershott, T., Jones, C. M., & Menkveld, A. J. (2011). Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? Journal of Finance, 66(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01604.x
Hirschey, N., & Weygandt, A. (2020). The impact of social media sentiment on stock prices. Journal of Financial Markets, 53, 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2019.05.003
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2022). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.004
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541-1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04772.x
Li, X., Wang, Y., & Hsieh, Y. (2020). Alternative data and stock price efficiency: Evidence from social media and satellite imagery. Journal of Financial Markets, 51, 101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2019.06.001
Lo, A. W. (2017). Adaptive markets: Financial evolution at the speed of thought. Princeton University Press.
Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.41
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2021). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12844
Lowies, G. (2016). Market sentiment and property prices: Evidence from the UK. International Review of Financial Analysis, 44, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.02.009
Menkveld, A. J., & Yueshen, B. (2016). High frequency trading around large institutional orders. Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2031-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12386
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Nanda, S., & Yunus, Y. A. (2024). Understanding Financial Inclusion Through Fintech: A Qualitative Inquiry into the Role of Technology in Shaping Financial Landscapes. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 4(1), 14-23.
Puspitasari, A., & Muslim, M. (2024). Understanding Financial Decision-making in Corporations: A Qualitative Inquiry into Leverage, Market Efficiency, and Financial Policy Implications. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 4(1), 45-55.
Putra, A. H. P. K., & Rivera, K. M. (2024). Digital Transformation and its Implications for Macroeconomic Performance: A Responsive and Adaptive Management Strategy Approach. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 4(2), 91-110.
Putrasemadhi, S. (1997). Political economy information, uncertainty, and investment decisions in less mature capital markets. Financial Management, 26(3), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3666029
Rasyid, A., & Zakaria, Z. (2023). The Effect of Financial Performance on the Stock Price of Service Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 3(1), 22-34.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2020). Regulation fair disclosure (Reg FD). Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/regulation-fair-disclosure.shtml
Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164967
Smith, T., & Wang, Q. (2019). High-frequency trading, liquidity, and price discovery: Evidence from the equity market. The Journal of Finance, 74(5), 2477-2525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12832
Smith, T., & Wang, Q. (2022). Algorithmic trading, machine learning, and market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(3), 791-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.004
Tsay, R. S. (2020). Analysis of financial time series. John Wiley & Sons.
Wang, Y., Li, X., & Hsieh, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence and financial markets: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 141, 112988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112988
Yunus, Y. A., & Nanda, S. (2024). Exploring Sustainable Finance: A Qualitative Inquiry into Responsible Investment and ESG Risk Evaluation. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 4(1), 01-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
