Exploring the Effectiveness of Remote and Hybrid Work Policies: A Literature Review on Workforce Management Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v11i2.798Keywords:
Remote Work, Hybrid Work, Workforce Management, LeadershipAbstract
This literature review examines the effectiveness of remote and hybrid work policies in contemporary workforce management practices. The study aims to explore the impact of remote work arrangements on employee productivity, job satisfaction, and work-life balance, as well as to identify best practices for organizational leaders in managing remote and distributed teams. A systematic review of existing literature was conducted, drawing on peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and academic books. The research highlights the benefits of remote work, including increased productivity and job satisfaction, attributed to reduced workplace distractions and enhanced flexibility. However, challenges such as social isolation and blurred work-life boundaries also emerge. Hybrid work models, combining remote and in-office work, are identified as a promising solution to address these challenges while maintaining opportunities for collaboration. Effective leadership, characterized by transformational leadership styles and proactive communication strategies, is crucial for facilitating successful remote and hybrid work arrangements. The findings underscore the need for ongoing research to explore emerging trends and best practices in remote and hybrid work policies, with a focus on the long-term effects on employee well-being and organizational performance.
Downloads
References
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Arunprasad, P., Dey, C., Jebli, F., Manimuthu, A., & Hathat, Z. El. (2022). Exploring the remote work challenges in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: review and application model. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2021-0421
Avlani, A., & Charalampous, M. (2021). Exploring the Significance of Remote Leadership Competencies in the Virtual Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.14781744.v1
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.144
Bartsch, S., Weber, E., & Büttgen, M. (2020). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: how to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-05-2020-0160
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Mertens, K. (2023). Work from home before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(4), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2017r2
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.48152/ssrp-t9fr-jr64
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3494473
Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. In Human resource management review (Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 569–574). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2021-0421
Dutcher, G. (2012). The effects of telecommuting on productivity: An experimental examination. The role of dull and creative tasks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 84, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2012.04.009
Evans, J., Taylor, J., Browne, J., Ferguson, S., Atchan, M., Maher, P., Homer, C. S. E., & Davis, D. L. (2020). The future in their hands: Graduating student midwives’ plans, job satisfaction and the desire to work in midwifery continuity of care. Women and Birth : Journal of the Australian College of Midwives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.011
Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Galanti, T., Ferrara, B., Benevene, P., & Buonomo, I. (2023). Rethinking the Unthinkable: A Delphi Study on Remote Work during COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Sciences, 12(9), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090497
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340
Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (2003). The distributed workplace: Sustainable work environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203616574
Johnson, A., Dey, S., Nguyen, H., Groth, M., Joyce, S., Tan, L., Glozier, N., & Harvey, S. B. (2020). A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being. Australian Journal of Management, 45(3), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220922292
Kossek, E. E., Dumas, T. L., Piszczek, M. M., & Allen, T. D. (2021). Pushing the boundaries: A qualitative study of how stem women adapted to disrupted work–nonwork boundaries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1615. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000982
Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M. B., Russo, M., & Morandin, G. (2023). Missed connections between the leadership and work–life fields: Work–life supportive leadership for a dual agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0085
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced workplace flexibility: Avoiding the traps. California Management Review, 57(4), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.5
Luebstorf, S., Allen, J. A., Eden, E., Kramer, W. S., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2023). Digging into “zoom fatigue”: A qualitative exploration of remote work challenges and virtual meeting stressors. Merits, 3(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3010010
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making telecommuting happen: A guide for telemanagers and telecommuters.
Onnis, L. (2016). What is a sustainable remote health workforce? People, practice and place. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH3806
Richter, A. (2020). Locked-down digital work. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102157
Schlegel, E. C., Tate, J. A., Pickler, R. H., & Smith, L. H. (2021). Practical strategies for qualitative inquiry in a virtual world. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(10), 4035–4044. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15000
Sha, D., Malarvizhi, A. S., Liu, Q., Tian, Y., Zhou, Y., Ruan, S., Dong, R., Carte, K., Lan, H., & Wang, Z. (2020). A state-level socioeconomic data collection of the United States for COVID-19 research. Data, 5(4), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5040118
Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macías, E., & Bisello, M. (2020). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? JRC working papers series on labour, education and technology.
Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020a). Smart working in Italia: origine, diffusione e possibili esiti. Psicologia Sociale, 15(2), 203–223.
Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020b). Social isolation and stress as predictors of productivity perception and remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of concern about the virus in a moderated double mediation. Sustainability, 12(23), 9804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239804
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2020.1800417
Wang, K., Yang, B., Wu, C., & Zheng, L. (2023). The moderation of satisfaction with working conditions in the association between workload and mental health among healthcare workers collecting test samples in the post-COVID-19 era. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1106299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1106299
Yang, Y., Youyou, W., & Uzzi, B. (2020). Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(20), 10762–10768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909046117
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
