Strengthening and Increasing MSME’s Competitiveness in Supporting South Sulawesi Economic Growth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v9i1.60Keywords:
Strengthening, Increasing, Competitiveness, Economic GrowthAbstract
The objectives of this research for three years (2021-2023) are: Year I: (1) Mapping MSMEs in South Sulawesi which have prospects to become suppliers of large or export-oriented businesses, (2) Analyzing the effect of strengthening and increasing the competitiveness of MSMEs in sustaining South Sulawesi's economic growth; Year II: (1) Conducting guidance and education to MSMEs and coaching agencies at the levels provincial and district in strengthening and increasing competitiveness, (2) Reviewing and establishing strategies for strengthening and increasing MSME competitiveness; Year III: ( 1) Build a model for strengthening and increasing the competitiveness of MSMEs, and (6) Applying a model for strengthening and increasing the competitiveness of MSMEs so that unable to sustain the economic growth of South Sulawesi. Diladata collectionkukanthrough a survey with 120 respondents in four districts of the sample (Makassar, Pare-pare, Bantaeng and Bulukumba). Testing the hypothesis with the Structural Equation Model (SEM) through the help of Software SPSSVersion 25. The results revealed that strengthening and increasing the competitiveness of MSMEs had a positive and significant impact on supporting economic growth in South Sulawesi. For this reason, the goal of this research is to build a model of MSME competitiveness, it is important to realize it in the next research stage in 2022 and 2023. The implication of this research is to contribute ideas to the Government South Provincial Sulawesi in the form of a model for increasing the competitiveness of SMEs.
Downloads
References
Andrea Nemethne Gal, 2010. Competitiveness of Small and Medium Sized enterprise – possible analytical framworks, Andrea Nemethne Gal, January, HEJ:ECO-100115-A, January, 2010.
Compton, William C and Edward Hoffman. (2005). Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Flourishing. USA: Jon-David Hague.
Lloyd-Reason, L. Dan Wall, S. 2000. Dimension of Competitiveness; Issues and Policies. Cheltenham. UK.
Markovics. Clara. 2005. Competitiveness of Domestic Small and Medium Enterprises in The European Union. European Integration Studies. Miskolc. 4(1):13-24.
Michael E. Porter. 1998. “Competitive Advantage” New York: The Free Press., translated edition (2008)., Kharisma Publishing Group.
Michael E. Porter. 2008. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. National prosperity is created, Harvard Business Review.
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, W. Dan Associates. 2004. Global Civil Society, Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Volume 2. Kamarian Press. Bloomfield, CT.
Supriatna T. Development Strategy and Poverty. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2000.
Tambunan, T., Nasution, F. 2008 Assessment of Improving the Competitiveness of SMEs based on Local Economic Development. Journal of the Study of Cooperatives and SMEs, Number 2 of 2008, VOL.1,26-40.
Tambunan. TTH2008. The Problem of MSME Development in Indonesia: An Effort to Find Alternative Ways, Papers,Economic Justice Forum, Institute for Global Justice. Accessed from http://www.kadin-indonesia.or.id, September 6, 2010.
Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Ministry of Cooperatives & SMEs RI.
William C. Clark, et al. 2005. Boundary Work for Sustainable development: Natural Resources Management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), PINAS Early Edition.
William E. Kovacic. 2011. Plus Factor and Agreement in AntitrustGeorge Law.Washington University Law School.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
