Altruistic Value Reflection Company Policy and Strategy: Finding Local Wisdom and the Meaning of CSR

  • Darwis Said Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Asriani Junaid Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Keywords: Altruistic values, company policy, strategy, corporate culture, local wisdom, CSR

Abstract

This research focuses on exploring the values ​​in company activities that can be justified as a form or model for implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR). Data collection was carried out through interviews, field observations, and literature studies. While data analysis was carried out using an ethnomethodological approach. This study indicates that incorporating business practices, through the organizational structure model and several CSR strategies and policies reflect the existence of altruistic values ​​, which are a form or model of CSR implementation. This can be seen in an organizational structure with the Town Service DepartmentExternal Relations Department, and Environmental, Health, and Safety Department (EHS). Activities and corporate culture that have a holistic dimension are guided by a vision, concern, jointness (in responding to and overcoming problems), and always learning and taking advantage of every accident. The results of this study indicate a meeting point between business interests and socio-environmental interests. There is a process of transforming knowledge of the company's sand culture on the behavior and way of thinking of the company's people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boatright, J. 2003. Ethics and Conduct of Business, 4th ed, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; Prentice Hall
Carroll, A. 1994. Social Issues in Management Research: Experts Views, Analysisand Commentary, Business and Society 33, No. 1: 5-29.
Denzin, N.K dan Lincoln S.Y. 1994. Handbook of Qualitatif Research, Sage PublicationInc. Thousand Oaks.
Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals With Fork: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford.
Etzioni, A. 1992. Dimensi Moral: Menuju Ilmu Ekonomi Baru, Penerbit: PT Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Garriga, E dan D. Mele. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping and Territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-74.
Goel, Mridulla dan Preeti E. Ramanathan 2014. Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility – Is there a dividing line?, Procedia Economics and Finance 11 ( 2014 ) 49 – 59.
Gorz, Andre. 2003. Ekologi dan Krisis Kapitalisme, Cetakan Kedua, Penerbit Insist Press, Yogyakarta.
Gray, Owen dan Adams. 1996. Acoounting and Accountability, Prentice Hall Europe.
Graves, S.B., K Rehbein, and S Waddock. 2001. Fad and Fashion in Shareholder Activism: The Landscape of Shareholder Resolutions, 1988 – 1998, Business and Society Review 106 (4), 293-314.
Lepoutre, J., dan A. Heene, 2006. Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 257-273.
McWilliams dan D.S. Siegel. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, The Academy of Management Review 26, 117-127.
Newman, Carol, et al. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment, The Journal of Development Studies, 2020, Vol. 56, No. 8, 1455–1472
Poloma, M. 1994. Sosiologi Kontemporer, Penerbit Gramedia, Jakarta.
Prasad, Mousami, et al. 2019. Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Evidence from India using energy intensity as an indicator of environmental sustainability, IIMB Management Review, 31, 374 -384.
Ritzer, G. 2012. Teori Sosiologi; Dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan terakhir Postmodern, Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Sudikin, Basrowi. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Perspektif Mikro, Penerbit Insan Cendekia, Surabaya.
Triyuwono, Iwan. 2000. Posmodernisme: Beberapa Konsep Transendental Tradisi Islam untuk Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi, Bisnis, dan Ekonomi, Disampaikan dalam acara “Short Course Metodologi Penelitian Paradigma Alternatif, diselenggarakan oleh Centre for Business and Islamic Economics Studies (CBIES) FE-Unibraw bersama IAI Kompartemen Akuntan Pendidik (IAI-KAPd) di FE Unibraw, 8-9 Mei 2000.
Wicks, A.C., R.E. Freeman, dan B. Parmer. 2004. Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Revisited, Organization Science, 15 (3), 364-369.
Zohar, Danah dan Ian Marshall. 2005. SC: Spiritual Capital, Memberdayakan SQ di Dunia Bisnis, terjemahan, Helmi Mustofa, Penerbit PT Mizan Pustaka, Bandung.
Published
2020-09-24