Reviewer Guideline

Components and evaluation indicator Reviewers assessment are described in the following Table:

No

Component

Evaluation Indicator of reviewer

1

Title

Effectiveness, Specification and clarity

2

Abstract (in English)

Complete and describe the essence  of article

3

Keywords

Describing the essential concept of article

4

Introduction (background, Objective or scope, literature Review)

Up-to-date, originality, relevance of the Topic, compatibility of the important reason of the research objective

5

Methods

Accuracy, Specification, and clarity

6

Results   (Analysis and Synthetic)

Analysis acuteness

7

Discussion (Interpretation)

Up-to-date finding, relevance to the interrelated researches, and the scientific contribution effect of finding /idea to the development of science

8

Conclusion

Logical, valid, brief and clear

9

Suggestion

For practical action, development of new theory, and next/advanced research

10

Bibliography

Degree of up-to-date and the reference of primary book sources.

Rules: at least 90% of the journals or the interrelated scientific researches, above 2010 (year)